Why China could lead the next phase of globalization

Donald Trump is the 45th president of the United States. Among his promises are a 45% import tax on Chinese products, the cancellation of the Paris climate agreement and, as was confirmed today, the end of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

chinafutureIf he doesn’t go back on his plans for global trade and international affairs, Trump will give room to other nations to take the lead in shaping globalization. While the US might be taking a step back from the world – a world it helped to create, to a large extent – China in particular can be expected to take on a more prominent role.

While the US is currently the world’s largest economy, in purchasing-power terms China is expected to overtake it in 2016, according to the International Monetary Fund. China has benefited significantly from globalization. Over decades, it has invested in enhancing its capabilities and built economic links with many countries. It has become viewed as an important overseas partner and investor.

This chart shows how China is forecast to overtake the US as the world’s dominant economic power by 2030, based on share of global GDP, trade and exports.

economicleaders

Image: Economist

Something China understands very well is the importance of connectivity – and hence transport infrastructure – for economic growth and development. Its major development framework is the One Belt One Road initiative with its two pillars, the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. This development project involves a territory equal to 55% of global GDP, 70% of the global population and 75% of its known energy reserves. “The investments will involve about 300 projects extending from Singapore to Turkmenistan,” reports Reuters.

One building block of One Belt One Road – also known as OBOR – is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This China-driven alliance will comprise Australia, New Zealand, China, India, Japan and South Korea – as well as the ASEAN region. In 2014, ASEAN was the seventh-largest economic power in the world. It was also the third-largest economy in Asia, with a combined GDP of US$2.6 trillion – higher than all of India.

China on the world stage

On the African continent, China is lending billions towards large-scale infrastructure investments, again part of OBOR, and particularly in transportation. One of its flagship projects is the Standard Gauge Railway in Kenya. There’s also the development of deepwater ports in cities such as Dakar, Dar es Salaam and Djibouti. These are likely to become industrial hubs, following the model of China’s development of the new Cameroonian deepwater port of Kribi.

The Russian Trans-Siberian Railway (TSR) is at the origin of rail transportation between Europe and Asia. Recently, Anthony Cuthbertson wrote in Newsweek that Vladimir Putin may be envisaging a Hyperloop Silk Road. This could present an alternative to the planned construction of 64,000 kilometres of rail tracks that are intended to strengthen existing pathways between the east and west. CRRC Corp, China’s largest maker of railway equipment, was in talks for a potential investment in Hyperloop One, the company behind the idea, Bloomberg reported earlier this year.

Meanwhile, China is launching an $11 billion fund for Central and Eastern Europe, targeting investments in infrastructure and high-tech manufacturing, among other things, both in the region and beyond. Supply-chain operator DB Schenker started running weekly block trains between China and Germany as long ago as 2011. Four years later, the first train carrying containers from China arrived in the Rail Service Centre freight terminal in the Port of Rotterdam.

With the New Development Bank (NDB), the Silk Road Fund and the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), China has prepared itself for responses to major financing needs – within and beyond the Belt and Road area. This shows some similarity with the Marshall Plan, the US support plan that helped to rebuild western Europe after the end of the Second World War.

With the US pulling out of the TPP, as Trump has indicated it will, China holds an advantage. The binding agreement, which connects Asian countries to North and Latin American nations, has been perceived by many as an obstacle to China’s reach and a way to solidify US alliances with other nations in the Pacific region. Other Asian countries with high export potential, such as Malaysia and Vietnam, are expected to benefit significantly from TPP, while countries that did not sign the agreement, such as the Philippines, risk losing out. This could have a disruptive effect on the region due to trade and investment diversion.

So far, China has faced scepticism and criticism for its international activities. Many have questioned its development in Africa, for example. But China could yet regain a level of moral authority; it could lead the global climate adaption effort if the US pulls away, for instance. It has already warned Trump against backing away from the Paris climate deal.

What’s in store for relations between the US and China? For a start, there may be tough negotiations over the US import tax on Chinese goods. If both nations find the right balance, they will not only avoid a global trade war, as in the 1930s when the implementation of the Smoot-Hawley tariff act intensified nationalism around the world, but they could also move their bilateral relations to new grounds.

Whatever happens, if the US pulls away from globalization, China stands ready to fill the gap.

This blog was originally posted on the World Economic Forum Agenda.

Don’t Blame China For Taking U.S. Jobs

The problems are more complicated than that.

Where have all the manufacturing jobs gone? If you ask Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, the answer is clear: China! But there is another, more plausible explanation. To paraphrase Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, “It’s the robots, stupid”.

The U.S. has lost 5 million factory jobs since 2000. And trade has indeed claimed production jobs – in particular when China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. Nevertheless, there was no downturn in U.S. manufacturing output. As a matter of fact, U.S. production has been growing over the last decades. From 2006 to 2013, “manufacturing grew by 17.6%, or at roughly 2.2% per year,” according to a report from Ball State University. The study reports as well that trade accounted for 13% of the lost U.S. factory jobs, but 88% of the jobs were taken by robots and other factors at home.

If not China, what then explains these jobs losses? It’s simple: factories don’t need as many workers as they used to, because robots increasingly do the work.

manufacturing1Investment in automation and software has doubled the output per U.S. manufacturing worker over the past two decades. Robots are replacing workers, regardless of trade at an accelerating pace. “The real robotics revolution is ready to begin” writes BCG and predicts that “the share of tasks that are performed by robots will rise from a global average of around 10% across all manufacturing industries today to around 25% by 2025.”

With increasing automation, the manufacturing industry is becoming more productive. From 1998 to 2012, all sectors experienced a productivity growth of 32% when adjusted for inflation – the production of computer and electronic products rose 829%. The researchers at Ball State University calculated: If 2000-levels of productivity are applied to 2010-levels of production, the U.S. would have required 20.9 million manufacturing workers instead of the 12.1 million actually employed.

Many of today’s customers demand fast products, such as fast fashion with quickly changing models. Producing far away is only then still an option when margins are high and able to absorb high transport cost for air transportation. Moving closer to markets means more distributed manufacturing which reduces also the impact of disruptive events, such as the tsunami in Japan and the flooding in Thailand.

Focus on manufacturing pays off. One example is Greenville, South Carolina. Greenwille was for decades the state’s heart of the textile industry till its gradual decline when confronted with competition from Mexico and South East Asia. “In 1990, 48,000 people still worked in textile manufacturing in the Greenville area, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Today fewer than 6,000 do” we can read in MIT Technology Review.

The U.S. needs to aim at leading the adoption in robotics. According to the BCG report, manufacturing labor costs in 2025 are expected to be 33% lower in South Korea for example and only 18% to 25% lower in the U.S. Therefore, South Korea is estimated to improve its manufacturing cost competitiveness by 6 percentage points relative to the U.S. by 2025. Focus need as well as skilled workers due to the fundamental shift in competences and because programming and automation talent will replace low-cost labor as key drivers of manufacturing competitiveness.

The focus on China is diverting energy from the real challenge. This is not only misleading but puts at risk the future of the U.S. economy.

Read my full article on Fortune.

China: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

Image

Over the last three decades, the relentless rise of China’s export-driven economy has changed the face of world commerce. But China is now in flux as its economy transitions into a new stage of development, rendering the assumptions of yester-year obsolete. Tomorrow’s China will be a very different place, creating new opportunities, with new risks for manufacturers, traders, banks as well as supply chain and other service providers.

This whitepaper has been published at Transport Intelligence on 20 September 2013.

 

3G4G7759

CVA – Corporate Value Associates, a global strategy boutique, tracks critical trends in consumer and customer behaviour, companies, capital markets, infrastructure investment, government and social policy. CVA uses this information to help evaluate and forecast economic growth, and identify and capture opportunities by designing strategies and implementation plans that create value for companies around the globe.

Bruno Salle, Managing Director (Asia-Pacific) at CVA, believes the current slowing of GDP growth is part of a natural, needed rebalancing of China’s economy. “China is moving from an economy where growth was overly reliant on investment and exports to one where internal, private consumption is becoming one of the key drivers of growth,” he says. “This is a major structural transformation. Exports are – and will remain – an important contributor to China‘s economy. But the focus of growth is shifting from construction and manufacturing to more services, innovation and consumerism”.

First and foremost, China’s next stage of economic evolution will mean slower GDP growth rates. Reliance on exports and foreign investment will decline and the economy will be rebalanced to reflect the spiralling number of middle class consumers. These buyers will continue to grow in confidence and sophistication, driven by quality of living rather than just price. “The current slowdown isn’t the end of Chinese growth,” explains Salle. “It’s the start of growth that is not primarily bound to exports and heavy industry. But this is a process still in its infancy and it is important it is viewed in this context. It will take some time until a clear picture of China emerges, but there are clear trends evident already.”
Certainly, government policy makers are already leaving more and more decisions to the market. We also expect to see the rise of large private enterprises, the quality of suppliers of most products and services to broaden, and more determined steps taken to tackle corruption. The winning state-owned enterprises will need to learn to be more market driven as competition becomes increasingly fierce and government more transparent. Logistics value chains will largely be shaped by China’s inland development, the embrace of e-commerce and evolving international trade flows, particularly on intra-Asia lanes as China’s trade with neighbouring emerging markets continues to grow. Together, these three trends will bolster the logistics and supply chain business in China.

China‘s relatively strong road, rail, air and communication networks, large and flexible labour force and manufacturing know-how, particularly in the area of mass production, will remain major draws for producers of all shades. But the high cost of land and rising cost of labour on the coast, allied to growing domestic demand, will accelerate the shift inland of non-premium manufacturing. “The government is promoting the development of middle and western China, so foreign investors will face diminishing preferential policies in coastal areas,” expects Jian Lou, Partner (China) at CVA. “As businesses adapt to higher costs, new innovative business models will emerge.” China will transfer best practices to hinterlands, take more control of its own production standards and make greater efforts to protect intellectual property rights. However, Chinese refinements of western researched, designed and manufactured products will remain a concern.

China’s restructuring will have a major impact on logistics needs and demands. The market will, for example, become more specialised by industry sector and mode. Consolidation can also be expected, and logistics companies will be forced to continue expanding networks as markets move to Northern and Western China. The more balanced manufacturing landscape in China will bring more balanced flows and should therefore result in better capacity utilisation and lower costs for carriers, logistics companies, shippers, as well as buyers and consumers in China and worldwide. But extracting the full benefits and value of making this transition will require new skills and ways of operating transportation businesses and networks.

E-tailing is a standout Chinese success story. Massive investments in e-commerce businesses and IT has opened new markets beyond the tier one and two cities in China. E-commerce has also driven demand for Chinese products in other parts of the world, such as Russia and Brazil. This is creating vast new internal and international distribution requirements and is having a major impact on the logistics value chain. Backing up this success within China will require higher delivery standards and more efficiency. In international markets, e-commerce companies and logistics providers are facing major challenges in customs clearance and finding the appropriate delivery platform. These trade and business obstacles also need to be overcome. “The transfer and adaptation of best practises from the West will be as important as bridging the gap in business practises and culture between the different markets,” says Lou. “Leveraging the knowledge of experts and companies experienced in this field will be critical to success.”

The renminbi (RMB) is gradually being internationalised, paving the way for even more efficient commerce, particularly between Asian countries. Indeed, intra-Asian travel and trade is expected to prosper, not least as ASEAN member countries create a new free trade area from 2015. China will not only seek to bolster its regional influence, but look as well to emerging markets in Africa, South America and the Middle East, where it has already forged relationships through its huge consumption of commodities and investment in infrastructure. Logistics players focusing on intra-Asian flows and emerging markets will benefit from these developments.

A paradigm ‘thought’ shift in China among citizens and policy makers will be a key driver in a gradually growing embrace of environmentalism and Corporate Social Responsibility by individuals and State. This, in conjunction with the increasing enforcement of laws and operating standards, will impact the choice of equipment and the way logistics players operate. Companies need to be aware of all the trends and changes and need to assess the relevance of these developments for the future operating requirements and business plans.

All participants in the logistics value chain need to adjust to the changing landscape. The attractiveness of the logistics offer to shippers and supply chain customers is a function of all components of the logistics value chain, including information, security and inland transport to, for example, ports in respect of price, time and quality. Logistics companies will look for the optimal value proposition at river ports, seaports and airports and will go where they can make the best margins when serving their customers in an increasingly competitive market. While larger logistics players will act strategically to serve their more sophisticated buyers, smaller transportation and logistics companies will go wherever they get the best offers from brokers and consolidators.

Overall, increasing sophistication in the logistics value chain can be expected, which represents a major opportunity for those players which prepare best, and a major risk for those who do not. It will be a challenging journey for all participants and much of the path remains unclear. What is clear, however, is that companies wishing to win and grow in China need to deeply understand China’s international economic dependencies and interdependencies of internal markets, including government views and plans. For example, expanding business or moving production into China’s interior requires a deep knowledge of different cities, verticals, customers and competitors – local and foreign – if all options are to be properly assessed and the no regrets and best value option moves identified and successfully executed.

China will remain an opportunity to diversify business portfolios and overtake even larger competitors for companies which have the necessary insights. For those who do not, it will be a harsh proving ground.

“It might take time for China‘s economic output to shift from growth in manufacturing and construction to economic growth built on services and innovation and domestic consumption,” says Salle. “What should be remembered is that China has been able to weather and overcome huge economic, social and political challenges and manage far reaching reforms throughout its history, including over the last three decades.” There is no reason to think it will not be able to do so again and again.